 |
   |
|
| |
|
|
| Subject |
I know you did, that's why it's funny. |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
Kenny on November 23, 2005 at 2:01 PM |
|
| |
This message has been viewed 30 times. |
|
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
I meant stripping it has nothing, IMO, to do with posted by Scotts94z32 on November 23, 2005 at 01:54 PM |
|
| |
|
|
| Message |
The less load on an engine means less wear and tear. Stripping a chassis decreases the weight, thereby decreasing the engine load. Furthermore it decreases the load on suspension components, braking mechanisms, etc. You could argue that you would see higher speeds, so the braking load decrease would be nominal, but the fact is you're going balls to the wall braking before turns so it's probably still a braking stress decrease overall. Guapo was probably referring to the performance differential between NA and TT and suggested stripping as a mechanism to even the playing field, but you asked for a basis for stripping increasing reliability, so there you go =).
Recursively Yours,
Kenny...
PETZ Member #5
SteamyZ. Never had did me wrong. - SL103 07/06/04 11:58:15
|
|
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a
Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
